Notion vs Obsidian: Why I Wasted 6 Months Forcing The Wrong Tool
I wasted six months trying to force one app to be everything. My Notion workspace became a cluttered mess of databases, templates, and half-finished thoughts. Opening it each morning felt overwhelming before I’d even started working.
Notion and Obsidian serve fundamentally different purposes: Notion excels at team collaboration and shipping work while Obsidian dominates solo thinking and idea synthesis. Most people try to force one tool to handle both functions, creating stress and inefficiency. The solution isn’t choosing between them but understanding which cognitive mode each tool optimizes for.
After running both systems for two years, my stress disappeared when I stopped fighting this reality. Notion handles my team-facing work and shipping logistics. Obsidian is where my actual thinking happens. Each tool does what it was designed for instead of trying to be everything to everyone.

If you’re researching knowledge management systems, you’ve probably read the same generic comparisons I did. They compare features and pricing but skip the real question: what are you actually trying to accomplish? Understanding how your personality influences your work preferences makes choosing the right system much clearer.
Why Do Most “Second Brain” Setups Fail?
The concept sounds appealing. A digital system that captures everything you know, surfaces connections you’d miss, and turns scattered thoughts into coherent insights. But most people approach this backwards. They pick a tool first, then try to force their thinking into whatever structure that tool provides.
I’ve watched this play out dozens of times with colleagues and clients:
- The Notion enthusiast builds an elaborate dashboard with databases and views, then abandons it three months later because maintaining the system became more work than using their brain
- The Obsidian optimizer installs fifteen plugins and creates complex folder hierarchies, then gets paralyzed by all the options and never actually writes anything meaningful
- The app switcher migrates between systems every six months, losing institutional knowledge each time and never building sustainable habits
Your second brain needs to match how you actually work. For introverts who value deep thinking and sustained focus, this matters even more. We don’t want tools that interrupt us with notifications or require constant maintenance. We need systems that open instantly, stay quiet, and get out of our way.
Frontiers in Psychology’s work on knowledge management systems shows that effective knowledge management involves complex interactions between cognitive processes, organizational systems, and human psychology. Notion excels at the shipping part: tracking status, collaborating with others, maintaining shared roadmaps. Obsidian excels at the thinking part: fast capture, surfacing connections, supporting original synthesis.
Most people need both functions but assume one app should handle everything. That assumption creates the stress.
What Led Me to This Split System Approach?
I started with Evernote in 2012 because everyone else was using it. It worked fine for basic capture but felt clunky for anything beyond simple notes. Searching was slow. Organization meant endless notebooks and tags. Nothing connected naturally.
OneNote promised better organization but the canvas-style pages didn’t match my systematic thinking style. I’d lose track of where information lived. The syncing felt unreliable, especially on planes where I do my best thinking.

Notion arrived in 2019 and felt revolutionary. Databases meant I could finally track my content strategy properly. I could build templates for briefs, create kanban boards for workflow, and share everything with team members. For the first time, my team had a single source of truth for projects and processes.
But I kept hitting friction with solo thinking work. Opening Notion meant seeing my entire workload: deadlines, team requests, incomplete tasks. Even when I wanted to just capture an idea, the visual reminder of everything else demanded attention. My deep thinking suffered.
That offline flight moment crystallized everything. I’d queued a deck outline but the page hadn’t fully cached. I ended up writing in Apple Notes and reconciling later, losing several granular thoughts in the process. I realized Notion worked brilliantly for final artifacts but terribly for initial thinking.
I added Obsidian in 2022 specifically for solo brainwork. The learning curve felt steeper at first. Folders versus tags, links versus databases, plugins versus native features. But once my vault structure clicked, the tool became invisible. Now I open Obsidian and just think. No lag, no distractions, no visual reminders of other work.
How Does Each System Actually Work in Practice?
Notion feels like a collaborative workspace. You build pages, databases, and views that multiple people can access simultaneously. Properties let you add structure: status fields, date ranges, ownership, priority levels. The interface is polished and intuitive for team members who aren’t technical.
The database model creates powerful perspectives on your work:
- Editorial kanban view for workflow management across team members
- Upcoming 30-day view for deadline planning and capacity planning
- Published log view for performance tracking and historical reference
- Cluster view for SEO strategy and content gap identification
- Owner-filtered views so team members see only their relevant work
This creates massive alignment across projects because everyone sees the same source of truth through their preferred lens.
But that polish comes with tradeoffs. Notion runs in the cloud, which means lag on big pages, slower mobile experience, and offline access that works sometimes. When you have thousands of notes, searching slows down. The rich text editor encourages formatting that looks nice but doesn’t age well if you ever need to export your content.

Obsidian works completely differently. It’s local-first, which means everything lives on your device as plain Markdown files. Open the app and it loads instantly. No spinning beachball, no sync delay, just immediate access to every note you’ve ever written. This speed enables a different kind of thinking.
The vault structure feels like a personal library that only you access. You create notes, link them together, and let the backlinks surface unexpected connections. Tags and folders provide organization, but the real power is in bidirectional links. Write a note about boundaries, link it to three other notes, and suddenly you see patterns across different contexts.
Plugins extend functionality without bloating the core app:
- Dataview lets you query your notes like a database without leaving the thinking environment
- Templater automates repetitive formatting so you focus on content rather than structure
- Periodic notes create daily, weekly, and monthly structures automatically for consistent capture habits
- Excalidraw adds visual thinking capabilities for diagrams and mind maps
But you control what gets added, keeping the system as simple or complex as you need.
What’s the Learning Curve Really Like?
Notion feels easy at first but gets complex later. You can start using basic pages immediately. The interface makes sense. You add blocks, nest pages, and invite team members without confusion. Most people feel productive within a few hours.
Then you discover databases and everything changes. Properties, formulas, relations, rollups. Each adds power but introduces cognitive overhead. You start thinking in tables instead of ideas. I’ve seen people spend more time perfecting their Notion system than actually using it to think or create.
The database complexity matters most when you’re trying to capture quick thoughts:
| Quick capture friction | Impact on thinking |
| Which database does this belong in? | Categorization interrupts flow state |
| What properties should I set? | Structure decisions override content focus |
| Should this be a page or database entry? | Format questions delay idea capture |
| How does this connect to existing content? | Manual relationship building slows synthesis |
The friction accumulates until you stop capturing ideas spontaneously.
Obsidian has the opposite trajectory. The first few days feel confusing. Folders versus tags, when to link, how plugins work, whether you need a structure at all. The blank vault offers no guidance. You can easily spend a week tinkering with setups you saw on YouTube instead of actually writing.
But once your structure clicks, it becomes invisible. My setup took about a month to stabilize: inbox for quick capture, projects for active work, areas for ongoing responsibilities, resources for reference material, archive for completed items. Productivity expert Tiago Forte’s PARA method provides a simple framework that works beautifully in Obsidian’s folder structure. Now I never think about structure. I just write and link.

What Was the Moment I Knew Obsidian Was Different?
The Obsidian success that sold me completely happened during a research session on workplace boundaries. I’d been taking notes for weeks across different contexts: team dynamics, client relationships, leadership decisions, personal energy management. Each note lived independently with basic tags for loose organization.
One day I searched for the boundaries tag and Obsidian surfaced a cluster I hadn’t consciously created: three separate articles, one book excerpt, two meeting notes, and a strategy outline all connected through backlinks. That random collection became a high-performing outline for a boundaries-at-work piece in about 20 minutes. The vault was thinking with me, not just storing for me.
That’s when I understood the power of atomic notes and emergent structure. German sociologist Niklas Luhmann developed the Zettelkasten method showing how linking individual ideas creates unexpected insights over time. I wasn’t building a system to find things I already knew about. I was creating an environment where my past thinking could surprise me with connections I’d missed.
Psychology Today’s analysis of introvert cognitive processing demonstrates that introverts react quickly to new stimuli while expending significant mental effort analyzing information deeply. You can’t replicate this emergent connection-making in Notion’s database model because everything lives in structured tables rather than freeform interconnected notes.
When Does Notion Actually Win?
You need Notion if you collaborate with others weekly and require shared roadmaps, approvals, and status visibility. The team coordination features justify the tradeoffs in thinking speed and offline access. I’ve watched Notion transform chaotic team operations into smooth processes dozens of times.
Choose Notion when you live in databases and need multiple perspectives on the same information:
- Content calendars with editorial, SEO, and performance views of the same articles
- Lightweight CRM systems for tracking prospects, clients, and project history
- Task management with multiple properties, filters, and team assignments
- Resource libraries that multiple team members need to access and update
- Process documentation that requires approval workflows and version control
Notion makes sense when you want a single web workspace your team can learn quickly. Non-technical team members can edit pages, update databases, and track status without training. The polished interface reduces friction for collaboration across different skill levels.
But recognize what you’re optimizing for: shipping and coordination rather than thinking and synthesis. Notion keeps projects moving, deadlines visible, and team members aligned. Those benefits matter enormously for getting work completed and delivered.
When Does Obsidian Actually Win?
You need Obsidian if you write, research, or strategize solo and want speed, privacy, and offline-first access. The local-first architecture means your thinking never depends on internet connectivity or cloud sync. For introverts who do deep work in focused environments, this reliability matters.
Choose Obsidian when you value plain text Markdown that won’t break in five years. Your notes remain readable and portable regardless of what happens to the company, the app, or your subscription. This future-proofing provides peace of mind that cloud-dependent systems can’t match.

Obsidian fits people who think in links rather than blocks. If you’re drawn to Zettelkasten methods, PARA organization, or Johnny.Decimal systems, the vault structure supports these approaches naturally. You’re building a network of connected thoughts rather than a filing cabinet of isolated documents.
The plugin ecosystem means you can customize exactly what you need without accepting features you don’t want:
| Core need | Plugin solution | Customization benefit |
| Visual thinking | Excalidraw, Mind Map | Diagrams stay linked to text notes |
| Task management | Tasks, Kanban | TODO items connect to project context |
| Academic research | Citations, Zotero integration | References link bidirectionally to concepts |
| Daily journaling | Periodic Notes, Calendar | Journal entries connect to project insights |
This control appeals to introverts who want tools shaped around our cognitive preferences.
Privacy matters too. Your notes never leave your device unless you explicitly choose to sync them. No company reads your content for AI training or advertising purposes. No data breaches expose your private thoughts. For sensitive research, strategic planning, or personal reflection, this security enables more honest thinking.
What Does My Current Setup Actually Look Like?
I run Obsidian as my primary thinking environment with a PARA-influenced structure. Five top-level folders: inbox for quick capture, notes for atomic ideas, projects for active work, areas for ongoing responsibilities, archive for completed items. This structure took a month to stabilize but hasn’t changed in two years. Combined with other low-noise productivity tools, this creates a complete thinking environment.
My core workflow starts with daily notes. I open Obsidian each morning, see today’s date, and capture anything that surfaces: ideas, tasks, observations, questions. Throughout the day I link these captures to relevant projects or areas. The friction for getting thoughts out of my head is nearly zero.
When I’m developing content, I create atomic notes for each concept, then link them together as connections emerge. For example, my boundaries research created notes for “manager boundaries,” “client boundaries,” “energy boundaries,” and “communication boundaries” that link bidirectionally. These connections surfaced article angles I never would have planned systematically.
My Notion setup handles everything that involves other people. One primary database tracks all content across projects: title, topic cluster, stage, owner, priority, target keyword, URL, next action. Different views serve different needs:
| View name | Purpose | Team member |
| Editorial kanban | Workflow management | Content team |
| Upcoming 30-day | Deadline planning | Operations manager |
| Published log | Performance reference | SEO specialist |
| Cluster view | Content strategy | Strategy lead |
The handoff between systems is intentional. Ideas mature in Obsidian through notes, links, and synthesis. When something reaches the “ready to ship” stage, it moves to Notion as a brief with all the operational detail team members need. This clean boundary prevents contamination in either direction.
How Do You Actually Make This Decision?
Ask yourself what you’re primarily trying to accomplish. If the answer is “coordinate with others and ship work consistently,” choose Notion. If the answer is “think deeply and make unexpected connections,” choose Obsidian. If it’s both, run both systems with clear boundaries.
Consider your collaboration frequency:
- Daily coordination with multiple team members means Notion’s real-time collaboration justifies its tradeoffs
- Weekly check-ins with occasional sharing can work with either system depending on other priorities
- Solo work with rare sharing means Obsidian’s speed and privacy matter more than collaborative features
- Mixed individual and team work often benefits from running both systems with clear handoff protocols
Think about your offline requirements. Regular plane travel, spotty internet, or focus sessions without connectivity make Obsidian’s local-first architecture essential. Reliable high-speed internet and primarily online work reduce this consideration.
Consider future-proofing priorities. Scientific American’s work on note-taking and memory shows that how we capture and process information significantly impacts retention and learning. Plain text Markdown files remain readable forever regardless of app availability. Notion’s proprietary format means your notes depend on continued company operation and your ongoing subscription.
What Would I Tell You Before You Start?
Pick one origin app for idea capture and stick to it. Don’t split initial thinking across multiple apps because you’ll lose context and create friction. For me, Obsidian is that origin point. Everything starts there, even if it ends up in Notion eventually.
Use Notion only for shared artifacts: final briefs, calendars, SOPs, anything that requires team visibility or collaboration. Stop trying to make it your personal thinking space. The tool wasn’t designed for that purpose and you’ll fight it constantly.
Limit yourself to three Obsidian plugins at first. Install Templater, Dataview, and Periodic Notes. Use those for at least a month before adding anything else. Most plugin sprawl comes from installing things that seem useful rather than solving actual pain you’re experiencing.
Give each tool at least three months before deciding it doesn’t work. Both systems have learning curves that create initial friction. That friction isn’t the same as the tool being wrong for you. Most people quit during the learning phase rather than pushing through to competence.
What’s the Truth About Living With Both Systems?
The key insight is recognizing that thinking and shipping are different cognitive modes requiring different tools. Obsidian optimizes for the exploratory, connective, synthesis mode where ideas develop. Notion optimizes for the structured, collaborative, execution mode where work gets completed.
My stress dropped dramatically when I stopped fighting this reality. I’m not maintaining two redundant systems. I’m using specialized tools for distinct purposes. The handoff between them is clean and intentional rather than creating duplicated effort or confusion about where things live.
For introverts who value focused thinking time and clear systems, this separation actually reduces cognitive load. Obsidian stays quiet and private. Notion stays collaborative and operational. Neither system tries to be something it’s not, which means both systems work reliably for their intended purposes.
The decision isn’t really Notion versus Obsidian. It’s understanding what you need from a second brain and choosing tools that support those specific requirements. Most people need both functions but assume one app should handle everything. Accept the division of labor and both systems serve you well.
Your second brain should amplify your natural thinking patterns rather than forcing you into someone else’s productivity system. For introverts who think deeply, value sustained focus, and prefer clear organizational systems, the right tool setup matters enormously. Understanding how technology can amplify introvert strengths while respecting our cognitive preferences makes the difference between tools that serve us and tools that drain us.
When you’re ready to optimize your entire work environment beyond just note-taking systems, our guide on transforming your home into a productivity powerhouse provides comprehensive strategies for creating spaces that support deep work and focused thinking.
This article is part of our Introvert Tools & Products Hub. Explore the full guide for more tools that support focused thinking.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use both Notion and Obsidian together effectively?
Yes, and this often works better than choosing just one. Use Obsidian for solo thinking, note-taking, and idea development where speed and privacy matter. Use Notion for team collaboration, project tracking, and final deliverables where shared access matters. The key is maintaining clear boundaries: Obsidian for thinking, Notion for shipping. This division reduces cognitive load rather than creating redundant systems.
Which is better for complete beginners with no note-taking system?
Notion is easier to start using immediately. The interface is intuitive, you can begin with simple pages, and functionality expands as you learn. Obsidian has a steeper initial learning curve requiring decisions about folder structure, linking approaches, and plugins before you feel productive. However, Obsidian’s simplicity pays off long-term once your structure clicks. If you need results today, start with Notion. If you can invest two weeks learning, Obsidian rewards that patience.
Does Obsidian work offline better than Notion?
Obsidian works completely offline because all files live locally on your device. You can access and edit every note without internet connectivity. Notion offers offline mode but it requires pages to be cached beforehand and functionality is limited compared to online use. For regular plane travel, focus sessions without internet, or unreliable connectivity, Obsidian’s local-first architecture provides significantly better offline reliability.
Which app is better for team collaboration and project management?
Notion wins decisively for team collaboration. Real-time editing, database views everyone can access, comment threads, and permission controls make Notion excellent for coordinating work across teams. Obsidian is designed for individual use with some sharing capabilities through plugins, but it lacks native collaboration features. If your primary need is team coordination, choose Notion. If your primary need is solo thinking with occasional sharing, choose Obsidian.
How do I migrate my notes from Notion to Obsidian?
Export your Notion pages as Markdown files, then import them into Obsidian in batches rather than all at once. Focus on migrating active notes first while learning how Obsidian works. Don’t try to recreate Notion’s database structure in Obsidian because they work fundamentally differently. Instead, convert database entries into atomic notes and create links manually. This process works better as gradual migration over weeks rather than attempting complete transfer in one day.
About the Author
Keith Lacy is an introvert who’s learned to embrace his true self later in life. With a background in marketing and a successful career in media and advertising, Keith has worked with some of the world’s biggest brands. As a senior leader in the industry, he has built a wealth of knowledge in marketing strategy. Now, he’s on a mission to educate both introverts and extroverts about the power of introversion and how understanding this personality trait can unlock new levels of productivity, self-awareness, and success.







